About the Author

selfbuilt-avatar-cartoon-orange-3D-perspective-smallFor the last decade or so, I have been an online reviewer of LED flashlights. As you will see on my flashlightreviews.ca website, I have performed many hundreds of detailed reviews focusing on quantitative analyses of flashlight performance. These include calibrated output measures, continuous runtime analyses, and circuit oscilloscope measures – along with overall descriptions of build, use, and design.

As you can probably guess from these reviews, I have a scientific research background. I have had training in quantitative methods for my PhD in the health research field, and am currently employed as a professional in my industry. As a “hobby”, I enjoy doing comparative analyses in areas of personal interest (which currently includes scotch-style whiskies). Of course, integral to any analysis is communication – findings ways to clearly present findings in a way that people find useful. That’s what I hope to do here on whiskyanalysis.com.

One of drivers for my flashlight testing is to provide fair and honest comparative assessments – as an aid to allowing readers to choose a model that was right for them. I feel there remains a strong need in that field, given how often manufacturer claims continue to far exceed actual performance/capabilities. Even in a field rife with quantitative performance metrics, you really need comparative testing data collected under the same conditions, in the same manner, for all lights.

My ultimate goal here is similar, but the methods have changed (and it some ways, the needs as well). I want to provide you with a simple way to help you choose your next whisky – based on your personal preference. There is a similar problem in the whisky world as there is with flashlights, given all the marketing and hype that surrounds whisky production and sale. But in some ways, the need is even greater here, given the subjective nature of taste. And unfortunately, even well-meaning enthusiasts have further muddied the waters, by perpetuating myths and fictions that were specifically created to mislead the whisky drinker.

In my professional life, I have a lot of experience in trying to integrate expert scores and opinions for establishing consensus views. I am drawing upon that expertise in developing the methods for whisky reviewer integration here. There is a lot to demystify, so I will need to take quite a few detours when discussing all the potential confounds, biases and limitations of the analysis methods. But the point remains – I am doing the analyses so that you don’t have to. The goal is to arm you with the information you need, to help you make an informed decision on your next dram. This will be based on a rigorous assessment of the evidence, using well established scientific (statistical) methods.

The site is not about encouraging alcohol consumption. If you think you may have a problem with alcohol, please visit this health resource. For more guidance on finding and getting help, please visit here.

Sláinte!
Eric
selfbuilt@whiskyanalysis.com

P.S.: As always, I provide this resource free of charge – with no ads of any sort. If you would like to contribute to the maintenance and upkeep of this site and analysis (or buy me a dram!), please feel to donate to the cause at Paypal.me/selfbuilt or through the Paypal Donate button below:

3 comments

  • Eric, I have been a dedicated follower of your site, database and methodology, all of which I find fascinating and useful. I have used your database during the creation and operation of two separate whisky tasting clubs (non-profit – just a couple of bands of like-minded friends) over the past eight years. Everyone found your meta-critic scores and clustering analyses to be very useful.

    I have noted that the most recent addition to your database is dated January 20, 2023. I know that reviewers have published more reviews since then, and several new whiskies are not represented in your database. I really hope that you have not abandoned this great resource, and I hope even more that your personal circumstances have not interfered. I am encouraged to see that your most recent response to a comment was just three months ago. Still, that leads to my question – will you be continuing to update the database?

    Again, thanks very much for your work and I hope that you will continue.

    • I’ve been hoping to get back to updating the database. Its tough as a lot of reviewers have moved on, and it takes a lot of time to examine new ones for consistency. The more time goes by, the more work is involved in restarting.

      But I am hoping to put more work back into, given the interest out there. I just need to find a way to manage the work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.