{"id":1704,"date":"2016-04-21T11:30:59","date_gmt":"2016-04-21T15:30:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/?p=1704"},"modified":"2017-12-22T15:56:35","modified_gmt":"2017-12-22T20:56:35","slug":"collingwood-21-year-old-rye","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2016\/04\/21\/collingwood-21-year-old-rye\/","title":{"rendered":"Collingwood 21 Year Old Rye"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It is a little odd to be reviewing a limited-run whisky that came out over 2 years ago, as you are unlikely to be able to find this whisky anymore.\u00a0 But I recently had the opportunity to taste and review this whisky blind, which led to some interesting observations (to me, at any rate).<\/p>\n<p>It seems that few reviewers want to publicly reveal the results of blind taste testing (possibly because the results are likely not to put them in a good light). \ud83d\ude09\u00a0 The experience of the <a href=\"http:\/\/scotchnoob.com\/2016\/04\/11\/forty-creek-barrel-select\/\">Scotch Noob<\/a> on this front is revealing. I personally have a lot respect for reviewers who are willing to put themselves out there with blind tasting notes.<\/p>\n<p>The Collingwood 21yo was a bit of an unusual experiment for this Canadian distiller. Some 50 oak barrels of malted rye were set aside to age at the distillery. In 2013, these were married in a vat with toasted maplewood (just like regular Collingwood whisky), and released in time for Christmas 2013 (where it was ~$60 at the LCBO, I believe).<\/p>\n<p>I received a blind sample of this whisky from Redditor Devoz. All I knew was that it was a Canadian whisky, bottled at 40% ABV. Here is what I found in the glass, as posted in my blind review on Reddit:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Blind Tasting Notes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Nose:<\/strong>\u00a0 Very sweet, with some corn syrup-like characteristics. Lighter fruits, like pear and green apple, and darker fruits like red plums and raisins.\u00a0 There is a rich creaminess as well, with a slight chocolate note. Not getting much in terms of classic rye notes. No apparent solvent smells, which is a definite bonus. A nice nose, distinctive for a Canadian rye.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Palate:<\/strong>\u00a0 Brown sugar sweetness up front, with the traditional rye baking spices following immediately after (cinnamon and nutmeg in particular). Not too spicy, but more than I expected from the nose. Very sweet and creamy &#8211; I can imagine people calling this &#8220;smooth&#8221;. Darker fruits show up more now (especially figs and raisins).\u00a0 Slightly oaky. Sweet syrup returns at the end.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Finish:\u00a0<\/strong> Medium length. No bitterness, but not much going on here. Basically, somewhat bland and gentle, but in a good way (if that is possible).\u00a0 Light sweetness and a touch of cinnamon persist to the end.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, I mistakenly believed that this blind sample was a traditional Canadian rye blend, given that the rye spices weren&#8217;t very strong (i.e., I felt it didn&#8217;t have enough kick to be a straight rye). There was also a definite sweetness here that I found reminiscent of corn whisky, reinforcing the idea that this was a blended Canadian whisky. Quality-wise, I gave it a slightly below average score, as I didn&#8217;t find it particularly complex or interesting for its flavour characteristics.<\/p>\n<p>Given the reveal, I suspect the extended barrel aging (and marrying in toasted Maplewood) introduced greater barrel sweetness, and softened the rye expression. This would be consistent with my &#8220;smooth&#8221; observation above, as well as the lack of any off notes (which can commonly occur on younger Canadian whiskies). I note that Davin of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.canadianwhisky.org\/reviews\/collingwood-21-year-old-canadian-rye.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Canadian Whisky<\/a> particularly emphasized the &#8220;smoothness&#8221; of this whisky in his review.<\/p>\n<p>Here is how the Collingwood 21yo compares to other aged Canadian whiskies in the Meta-Critic database:<\/p>\n<p>Canadian Rockies 21yo: 8.97 \u00b1 0.24 on 4 reviews ($$)<br \/>\nCentury Reserve 21yo: 8.78 \u00b1 0.21 on 9 reviews ($$)<br \/>\n<strong>Collingwood 21yo: 8.66 \u00b1 0.45 on 9 reviews ($$$)<\/strong><br \/>\nDanfield&#8217;s 21yo: 8.68 \u00b1 0.51 on 11 reviews ($$)<br \/>\nGibson&#8217;s Finest Rare 18yo: 9.11 \u00b1 0.38 on 10 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nHighwood Ninety Rye 20yo: 8.94 \u00b1 0.22 on 9 reviews ($$)<br \/>\nWiser\u2019s 18yo: 8.71 \u00b1 0.42 on 14 reviews ($$$)<\/p>\n<p>The Collingwood 21yo is clearly at the lower end of the score range for aged Canadian whiskies.<\/p>\n<p>Having re-sampled it after the reveal, I&#8217;m not inclined to change my score or overall flavour assessment. I believe this particular expression may be a bit over-aged, as it is soft in flavour overall, and rather gentle on the way out. The relatively low 40% ABV doesn&#8217;t help either &#8211; this is one Canadian whisky that likely would have benefited from being bottled at higher strength. All that said, it does have a very nice nose.<\/p>\n<p>Personally, I still think its flavour characteristics and overall quality place it more in-line with the following budget-minded ($) whiskies:<\/p>\n<p>Forty Creek Copper Pot Reserve: 8.71 \u00b1 0.41 on 12 reviews ($)<br \/>\nForty Creek Barrel Select: 8.59 \u00b1 0.41 on 13 reviews ($)<br \/>\nHiram Walker Special Old Rye: 8.23 \u00b1 0.41 on 9 reviews ($)<br \/>\nWiser&#8217;s Small Batch: 8.57 \u00b1 0.27 on 11 reviews ($)<br \/>\nCanadian Club 100% Rye: 8.54 \u00b1 0.42 on 9 reviews ($)<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-1700 lazyload\" data-src=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Collingwood.21.jpg\" alt=\"Collingwood.21\" width=\"250\" height=\"384\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Collingwood.21.jpg 250w, https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Collingwood.21-195x300.jpg 195w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 250px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 250\/384;\" \/>For additional reviews of this whisky, you could check out Jason of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.insearchofelegance.net\/blog\/2016\/3\/18\/review-collingwoo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">In Search of Elegance<\/a>, and Andr\u00e9 and Patrick of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.quebecwhisky.com\/collingwood-21-ans-canadian-rye-whisky\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Quebec Whisky<\/a>. I certainly concur with them on how soft this rye is &#8211; although I don&#8217;t personally find it as strongly floral.\u00a0 I am surprised to note that some reviewers find a lot of rye here, like Davin of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.canadianwhisky.org\/reviews\/collingwood-21-year-old-canadian-rye.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Canadian Whisky<\/a> and Michael of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.divingforpearlsblog.com\/2014\/12\/four-canadian-whiskies-at-once.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Diving for Pearls<\/a>. But Beppi of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/life\/food-and-wine\/wine\/wine-reviews\/collingwood-rye-21-year-old-ontario\/article15587421\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Globe and Mail<\/a> experiences it as more Cognac-like, which I think is a better relative fit for this whisky.<\/p>\n<p>While it was certainly an interesting experience to taste and review blind, I don&#8217;t think this whisky is necessarily worth seeking out, except for its uniqueness. There are higher quality aged expressions currently available at comparable or lower prices.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It is a little odd to be reviewing a limited-run whisky that came out over 2 years ago, as you are unlikely to be able to find this whisky anymore.\u00a0 But I recently had the opportunity to taste and review this whisky blind, which led to some interesting observations (to me, at any rate). It seems that few reviewers want<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1701,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[48,21,146,25],"class_list":["post-1704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-whiskies","tag-21yo","tag-canadian","tag-collingwood","tag-rye"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1704"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1704\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4832,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1704\/revisions\/4832"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1701"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}