{"id":2134,"date":"2017-05-10T02:30:41","date_gmt":"2017-05-10T06:30:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/?p=2134"},"modified":"2017-05-10T02:33:30","modified_gmt":"2017-05-10T06:33:30","slug":"bushmills-black-bush","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2017\/05\/10\/bushmills-black-bush\/","title":{"rendered":"Bushmills Black Bush"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bushmills Black Bush is another example of an inexpensive blended Irish whisky &#8211; but it is in a different league from its entry-level little brother, Bushmills Original Blended.<\/p>\n<p>As I explained in my <a href=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2017\/05\/04\/bushmills-original-blended-irish-whiskey\/\">Bushmills Original<\/a> review, Bushmills blends single malt whisky with column-distilled grain whisky (just like blended scotch).\u00a0 In the case of Black Bush though, the malt component makes up a greater relative proportion of the blend compared to regular Bushmills, or to other blends at this price point (i.e., I&#8217;ve seen up to 80% malt reported online for Black Bush).<\/p>\n<p>The malt component of Black Bush is a mix of Oloroso sherry casks and ex-bourbon casks. This should add some sherried sweetness into the mix &#8211; another unusual feature at this price point.\u00a0 The whisky has no official age statement, but I&#8217;ve seen differing reports online that the base malt has being been aged for &#8220;up to 7 years&#8221; or for &#8220;8-10 years&#8221; before blending with the grain. None of that is mentioned on the label though, so all such claims should be taken with a grain of salt.<\/p>\n<p>Bottled at the standard 40% ABV, it is currently $37 CAD at the LCBO (compared to $32 for Bushmills original).<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s see how it does in my Meta-Critic whisky database compared to other Bushmills, and some other just-above entry-level Irish whiskies:<\/p>\n<p>Bushmills 10yo Single Malt: 8.17 \u00b1 0.30 on 19 reviews ($$$)<br \/>\nBushmills 16yo Single Malt: 8.48 \u00b1 0.48 on 16 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nBushmills 21yo Single Malt: 8.93 \u00b1 0.34 on 11 reviews ($$$$$)<br \/>\n<strong>Bushmills Black Bush: 8.35 \u00b1 0.40 on 20 reviews ($$)<\/strong><br \/>\nBushmills Original Blended: 7.63 \u00b1 0.49 on 15 reviews ($$)<\/p>\n<p>Glendalough Double Barrel: 8.29 \u00b1 0.40 on 5 reviews ($$)<br \/>\nJameson Caskmates Stout Edition: 8.27 \u00b1 0.48 on 8 reviews ($$)<br \/>\nJameson Select Reserve (Black Barrel): 8.37 \u00b1 0.38 on 17 reviews ($$)<br \/>\nTeeling Small Batch (Rum Cask Finish): 8.31 \u00b1 0.41 1on 9 reviews ($$)<br \/>\nThe Irishman Original Clan Irish Whiskey: 8.15 \u00b1 0.22 on 4 reviews ($$)<br \/>\nThe Irishman Founder\u2019s Reserve: 8.32 \u00b1 0.38 on 6 reviews ($$)<\/p>\n<p>Bushmills Black Bush is getting a very reasonable score for the price.<\/p>\n<p>Here is what I find in the glass:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nose<\/strong>: Light, with a touch of sherry (red fruits, raisins) along with some light fruits (apple, pear). A bit of apple cider. Sweet, but not artificially so (as I found on the original blended) &#8211; more your classic vanilla here. Certainly a lot more malty, which is nice. No real alcohol burn or off notes.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Palate<\/strong>: Mild, with even less fruit showing up now &#8211; but more of the vanilla and caramel. Touch of baking spices, and baked goods in general (i.e., a bit cakey, maybe stewed apples). Thin body, with no real burn &#8211; somewhat watery mouthfeel. Certainly nothing offensive about it, but not much to really recommend it either. Would be better at higher proof.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-2132 lazyload\" data-src=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Bushmills.Black_.Bush_.jpg\" alt=\"Bushmills.Black.Bush\" width=\"200\" height=\"645\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Bushmills.Black_.Bush_.jpg 200w, https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Bushmills.Black_.Bush_-93x300.jpg 93w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 200px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 200\/645;\" \/><strong>Finish<\/strong>: Short. Same notes as nose and palate, fading out without any real off notes.<\/p>\n<p>This is definitely better than <a href=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2017\/05\/04\/bushmills-original-blended-irish-whiskey\/\">Bushmills Original<\/a> blended, you could actually drink this one neat (although you are likely to find it a bit boring). For the extra $5 CAD, I would say this one is a no-brainer &#8211; Black Bush is a much nicer experience than the Original blended.<\/p>\n<p>That said, I still think the average Meta-Critic score is a bit overly generous here. I would score it lower than the Meta-Critic &#8211; but then, I was also harder on the basic Bushmills Original too.<\/p>\n<p>A number of reviewers really like this one, including <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ihRYXVDaIzs\">Ralfy<\/a>, jim Murray, Nathan the <a href=\"http:\/\/scotchnoob.com\/2015\/06\/08\/bushmills-black-bush-blended-irish-whiskey\/\">Scotch Noob<\/a>, Jason of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.insearchofelegance.net\/blog\/2016\/9\/2\/review-bushmills-black-bush-irish-whiskey\">In Search of Elegance<\/a>, and and Jan of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bestshotwhiskyreviews.com\/2013\/03\/bushmills-black-bush-review.html\">Best Shot Whisky<\/a>. Personally, I&#8217;m more in keeping with Oliver of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dramming.com\/2013\/07\/15\/bushmills-black-bush\/\">Dramming<\/a> and Thomas of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whiskysaga.com\/bushmills-black-bush\/\">Whisky Saga<\/a>. One of the lowest scores I&#8217;ve seen is from Serge of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whiskyfun.com\/archiveaugust10-2.html#230810\">Whisky Fun<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bushmills Black Bush is another example of an inexpensive blended Irish whisky &#8211; but it is in a different league from its entry-level little brother, Bushmills Original Blended. As I explained in my Bushmills Original review, Bushmills blends single malt whisky with column-distilled grain whisky (just like blended scotch).\u00a0 In the case of Black Bush though, the malt component makes<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2133,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[33,68,29],"class_list":["post-2134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-whiskies","tag-blended","tag-irish","tag-sherry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2134"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2134\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3812,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2134\/revisions\/3812"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2133"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2134"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}