{"id":2301,"date":"2016-08-22T17:27:12","date_gmt":"2016-08-22T21:27:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/?p=2301"},"modified":"2016-08-22T17:52:42","modified_gmt":"2016-08-22T21:52:42","slug":"springbank-18-year-old","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2016\/08\/22\/springbank-18-year-old\/","title":{"rendered":"Springbank 18 Year Old"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As mentioned in my recent review of the entry-level <a href=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2016\/08\/02\/springbank-10-year-old\/\">Springbank 10<\/a> year old, this Campbeltown distiller still performs the entire production process &#8211; from malting through to bottling &#8211; on site. They release lightly-peated offerings under the Springbank label, and also produce heavily-peated malt whisky (as Longrow), and peat-free malt whisky (as Hazelburn).<\/p>\n<p>The Springbank 18 year old is a popular expression among enthusiasts, having a garnered a number of awards. My sample is from the second batch, and is courtesy of the redditor xile_. It has a bit of everything in it &#8211; the classic briny Springbank character, a bit of smoke, and a bit of sherry.\u00a0 Bottled at a refreshing 46% ABV, Springbank doesn&#8217;t use coloring (or chill-filtering).<\/p>\n<p>Here is how it compares to the other Springbank single malts in my Meta-Critic Whisky Database:<\/p>\n<p>Hazelburn 8yo: 8.39 \u00b1 0.36 on 11 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nHazelburn 12yo: 8.63 \u00b1 0.25 on 14 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nLongrow Peated: 8.82 \u00b1 0.19 on 12 reviews ($$$)<br \/>\nLongrow 10yo: 8.57 \u00b1 0.42 on 12 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nLongrow 18yo: 9.17 \u00b1 0.22 on 7 reviews ($$$$$)<br \/>\nSpringbank 10yo: 8.69 \u00b1 0.25 on 19 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nSpringbank 12yo Cask Strength: 8.84 \u00b1 0.28 on 16 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\n<strong>Springbank 18yo: 8.96 \u00b1 0.19 on 17 reviews ($$$$$)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>And here is how it compares to some other whiskies of similar age and style (although most below are more heavily peated):<\/p>\n<p>Ardbeg 17yo: 9.04 \u00b1 0.28 on 7 reviews ($$$$$+)<br \/>\nBunnahabhain 18yo: 8.99 \u00b1 0.17 on 14 reviews ($$$$$)<br \/>\nCaol Ila 18yo: 8.66 \u00b1 0.51 on 14 reviews ($$$$$)<br \/>\nHighland Park 18yo: 9.11 \u00b1 0.25 on 22 reviews ($$$$$)<br \/>\nLagavulin 16yo: 9.23 \u00b1 0.23 on 25 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nLaphroaig 18yo: 9.03 \u00b1 0.27 on 18 reviews ($$$$$)<br \/>\nLongrow 18yo: 9.17 \u00b1 0.22 on 7 reviews ($$$$$)<br \/>\nOban 18yo: 8.70 \u00b1 0.22 on 12 reviews ($$$$$)<br \/>\n<strong>Springbank 18yo: 8.96 \u00b1 0.19 on 17 reviews ($$$$$)<\/strong><br \/>\nTalisker 18yo: 9.20 \u00b1 0.20 on 15 reviews ($$$$$)<\/p>\n<p>Springbank 18 yo gets a very respectable score for a lightly-peated whisky (recall that heavily-peated whiskies invariably score higher in my database).<\/p>\n<p>Here is what I find in the glass:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nose<\/strong>: Sweet fruit compote, with tons of berries (blueberry, strawberry, raspberry), plums, rhubarb, raisins, and even some banana oddly enough.\u00a0 Vanilla and toffee. Much less peat than the 10 yo, but still a bit of smoke.\u00a0 Has the classic briny Springbank character, with a bit of pepper now. Rich, like creamed wheat. Very nice.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Palate<\/strong>:\u00a0 Vanilla and toffee dominate, with fruits taking a back seat (although some red currants coming through now). Salty. Good peppery kick, with black licorice (anise) and some extra chilli spices thrown in. Cereal notes coming up now too. Very oily mouthfeel, rich and decadent.\u00a0 A bit of tongue tingle builds. Faintest hint of smoke.<\/p>\n<p><strong><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-2288 lazyload\" data-src=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Springbank.18.jpg\" alt=\"Springbank.18\" width=\"250\" height=\"668\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Springbank.18.jpg 250w, https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Springbank.18-112x300.jpg 112w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 250px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 250\/668;\" \/>Finish<\/strong>: Long.\u00a0 Salty, briny sea air with new notes of sweet chocolate showing up now. None of the bitterness or artificial sweetener I noticed on the 10 yo. Lingering spice. Just the right mix for my palate.<\/p>\n<p>I tend to think of this Scotch as a slightly saltier and smokier version of my favourite <a href=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2016\/06\/17\/bunnahabhain-18-year-old\/\">Bunnahabhain 18 yo<\/a>. Not quite as overtly sherried perhaps, but still a relatively sweet dessert dram.<\/p>\n<p>While the Springbank 18 shows a relatively low standard deviation, opinions on this whisky can still vary. A particular point to keep in mind is that individuals differ in their ability to detect trace amounts of sulphur and other (typically) averse aromas and flavours. I discussed the genetics of this briefly in my <a href=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2015\/06\/28\/mortlach-rare-old\/\">Mortlach Rare Old<\/a> review. For further discussion related to this particular sample, check out my comments in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/Scotch\/comments\/4y5ane\/review_20_springbank_18\/\">xile_&#8217;s review<\/a> of the same bottle on the reddit whisky network.<\/p>\n<p>As a general rule, if you are someone who is sensitive to bitter\/sulphur notes, try a splash of water &#8211; that typically helps.<\/p>\n<p>The highest praise I&#8217;ve seen for this whisky is from the Reddit whisky network, followed by the guys at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.quebecwhisky.com\/springbank-18-ans\/\">Quebec Whisky<\/a>, Oliver of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pourmeanotherone.com\/2010\/12\/28\/springbank-18-yo\/\">Pour Me Another One<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=c_EefuAgp64\">Ralfy<\/a>, and Michael of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.divingforpearlsblog.com\/2013\/09\/single-malt-report-springbank-18-year.html\">Diving for Pearls<\/a>. Although I have yet to see a truly negative review, more moderately positive examples come from Thomas of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whiskysaga.com\/springbank-18-yo\/\">Whisky Saga<\/a>, John of <a href=\"http:\/\/whiskyadvocate.com\/ratings-reviews\/?brand_id=146&amp;rating=0&amp;price=0&amp;category_id=0&amp;issue_id=52&amp;reviewer=0\">Whisky Advocate<\/a>, and Jim Murray.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As mentioned in my recent review of the entry-level Springbank 10 year old, this Campbeltown distiller still performs the entire production process &#8211; from malting through to bottling &#8211; on site. They release lightly-peated offerings under the Springbank label, and also produce heavily-peated malt whisky (as Longrow), and peat-free malt whisky (as Hazelburn). The Springbank 18 year old is a<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2289,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[23,29,17,81],"class_list":["post-2301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-whiskies","tag-18yo","tag-sherry","tag-single-malt","tag-springbank"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2301"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2301\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2448,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2301\/revisions\/2448"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2289"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}