{"id":3947,"date":"2017-12-21T11:58:36","date_gmt":"2017-12-21T16:58:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/?p=3947"},"modified":"2017-12-28T10:50:47","modified_gmt":"2017-12-28T15:50:47","slug":"kavalan-ex-bourbon-oak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/21\/kavalan-ex-bourbon-oak\/","title":{"rendered":"Kavalan ex-Bourbon Oak"},"content":{"rendered":"

As I’ve previously reported, Kavalan offers two of their most popular Solist expressions – Bourbon Cask and Sherry Cask<\/a> – in a vatted format, known as the Kavalan ex-Bourbon Oak and Sherry Oak<\/a>, respectively.\u00a0 In Asia, these batch versions of the Solists are available at both cask-strength (typically ~54-59%, just like the single casks Solists) and at a reduced 46% ABV. Here in the Western hemisphere, I’ve only seen the 46% ABV versions.<\/p>\n

Supposedly, these two “Oak” series are vatted from the exact same type of casks used for the named Solist series. But it stands to reason that they probably cherry-pick the best casks for the single cask offerings, and vat the rest. Still, it is a good chance to sample what the distillery character is like (in a more consistent fashion), without having shell out for the more expensive (and rare) Solist single cask versions.<\/p>\n

These Oak-series whiskies are typically available as both full 700 mL bottles and 50 mL miniature glass bottles. As with my Sherry Oak<\/a> review, my sample here is of the 46% ABV, 50 mL ex-Bourbon Oak version. Bottling code is 2015.05.08 16:15. The bottle came in a cardboard box, and so was protected from light.<\/p>\n

Here is how the various Kavalan bottlings compare in my Whisky Database.<\/p>\n

Kavalan Concertmaster: 8.29 \u00b1 0.54 on 20 reviews ($$$$)
\nKavalan ex-Bourbon Oak: 8.93 \u00b1 0.25 on 5 reviews ($$$$)<\/strong>
\nKavalan King Car Conductor: 8.43 \u00b1 0.36 on 9 reviews ($$$$)
\nKavalan Sherry Oak: 8.63 \u00b1 0.33 on 6 reviews ($$$$$)
\nKavalan Podium: 8.77 \u00b1 0.34 on 8 reviews ($$$$)
\nKavalan Single Malt: 8.40 \u00b1 0.50 on 18 reviews ($$$$)
\nKavalan Solist Bourbon: 8.85 \u00b1 0.22 on 19 reviews ($$$$$)
\nKavalan Solist Fino Sherry Cask: 8.98 \u00b1 0.33 on 15 reviews ($$$$$+)
\nKavalan Solist Port Cask: 8.78 \u00b1 0.38 on 7 reviews ($$$$$)
\nKavalan Solist PX Cask: 9.01 \u00b1 0.72 on 5 reviews ($$$$$+)
\nKavalan Solist Sherry Cask: 9.08 \u00b1 0.35 on 16 reviews ($$$$$)
\nKavalan Solist Vinho Barrique: 8.94 \u00b1 0.36 on 12 reviews ($$$$$)<\/p>\n

There aren’t a lot of reviews to go by, but the 46% ABV vatted version of the ex-Bourbon Oak seems to be doing quite well.<\/p>\n

Let’s see what I find in the glass:<\/p>\n

Colour:<\/strong> Light apple juice – frankly, one of the palest Kavalans I’ve seen yet.<\/p>\n

Nose<\/strong>: Fruity, with lush tropical fruits like papaya, mango, pineapple, and banana (including green banana). Touch of citrus. Light honey and vanilla. Not creamy per se, more of a buttery note. Grassy, with some hay (fresh cut for both, not dry). Sweet. No off notes, which is impressive. Water dampens all of the above, and may bring up a touch of solvent (oddly), so I would skip water for nosing.<\/p>\n

Palate<\/strong>: Not quite as sweet as the nose, but there’s no mistaking that time in bourbon casks. Tons of vanilla and caramel. Rich oak without the typical spice or bitterness, doesn’t seem to have been aged too long. Noticeable coconut, and a bit nutty in general. But again, not very spicy, with maybe just a touch of nutmeg. Buttery texture. Fair amount of tongue tingle, but not offensive. Sweeter with water, which also helps with tingle (but doesn’t fully extinguish it).<\/p>\n

Finish<\/strong>: Caramel continues, with some of the light spices coming up now (nutmeg).\u00a0 A touch astringent, but not really bitter. Some of tropical and green fruit also show a resurgence. Very nice and even. With water, some bitterness does enter in.<\/p>\n

\"\"I recommend you go sparingly with water on the 46% ABV version – it certainly needs no more than few drops at most.<\/p>\n

All in all, a very pleasant ex-bourbon expression, very good for the presumed young age. Much better than the standard Kavalan single malt expression. As an aside, my wife – who is not a big scotch drinker – really liked this one.<\/p>\n

Among reviewers, Dominic of Whisky Advocate<\/a> is very positive, followed by washeewashee of Reddit<\/a> (for the cask-strength version), Jim Murray, and Patrick of Quebec Whisky<\/a>. Worth picking up if you come across a sample bottle in your travels.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As I’ve previously reported, Kavalan offers two of their most popular Solist expressions – Bourbon Cask and Sherry Cask – in a vatted format, known as the Kavalan ex-Bourbon Oak and Sherry Oak, respectively.\u00a0 In Asia, these batch versions of the Solists are available at both cask-strength (typically ~54-59%, just like the single casks Solists) and at a reduced 46%<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4118,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[59,39,18,17,51],"class_list":["post-3947","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-whiskies","tag-bourbon","tag-kavalan","tag-nas","tag-single-malt","tag-taiwan"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3947","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3947"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3947\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4899,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3947\/revisions\/4899"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4118"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3947"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3947"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3947"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}