{"id":4465,"date":"2017-09-20T07:46:47","date_gmt":"2017-09-20T11:46:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/?p=4465"},"modified":"2017-09-20T07:46:47","modified_gmt":"2017-09-20T11:46:47","slug":"amrut-spectrum-004","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2017\/09\/20\/amrut-spectrum-004\/","title":{"rendered":"Amrut Spectrum 004"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Given the success of their initial hybrid cask experiment, Amrut has released a second\u00a0 batch of Spectrum.<\/p>\n<p>As I explained in my review of <a href=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2016\/10\/28\/amrut-spectrum\/\">Batch 1<\/a>, Spectrum is a single hybrid cask build from different sources of wood. The custom barrel for the first batch was built from new charred American Oak, new lightly toasted French Oak, new lightly toasted Spanish Oak, ex-Oloroso Sherry staves, and ex-Pedro Ximenez (PX) Sherry staves. This time around, the Spanish Oak staves were left out. As these are considered to have among the least impact on flavour, the expectation is that the new batch should still have a very similar flavor profile to the original. This 4-source cask presumably explains the &#8220;004&#8221; added to the name for this second batch.<\/p>\n<p>This is a no age statement (NAS) release, but my original bottle of Spectrum batch 1 described the base spirit has having spent 3 years in traditional ex-Bourbon oak barrels before being transferred into the custom hybrid barrel for another 3.5 years. I don&#8217;t have the details for the Spectrum 004 &#8211; but will update this review if I find out.\u00a0 Apparently, only 1800 bottles of this second batch were produced (1000 were available the first time around). Again bottled at 50% ABV.<\/p>\n<p>As a big fan of the original Amrut Spectrum, I was glad to be able to swap a sample with Redditor Strasse007 for the new Spectrum 004.<\/p>\n<p>Here is how the two Spectrums compare to other Amruts in my Meta-Critic Whisky Database:<\/p>\n<p>Amrut Double Cask: 9.04 \u00b1 0.19 on 5 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Fusion: 8.89 \u00b1 0.25 on 25 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Greedy Angels (8yo and 10yo): 9.20 \u00b1 0.22 on 8 reviews ($$$$$+)<br \/>\nAmrut Herald: 8.91 \u00b1 0.15 on 6 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Indian Single Malt: 8.27 \u00b1 0.82 on 17 reviews ($$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Intermediate Sherry: 8.95 \u00b1 0.37 on 19 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Kadhambam: 8.91 \u00b1 0.25 on 13 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Naarangi: 8.55 \u00b1 0.63 on 10 reviews ($$$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Peated Single Malt: 8.69 \u00b1 0.32 on 12 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Peated Single Malt Cask Strength: 9.14 \u00b1 0.17 on 11 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Portonova: 8.98 \u00b1 0.30 on 17 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Portpipe Peated Single Cask (all casks): 8.76 \u00b1 0.39 on 11 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut PX Sherry Single Cask (all casks): 8.79 \u00b1 0.45 on 13 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Spectrum (all batches): 9.13 \u00b1 0.17 on 10 reviews ($$$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Spectrum (Batch 1): 9.16 \u00b1 0.20 on 10 reviews ($$$$$)<br \/>\n<strong>Amrut Spectrum 004 (Batch 2): 9.10 \u00b1 0.29 on 3 reviews ($$$$$)<\/strong><br \/>\nAmrut Rye: 8.87 \u00b1 0.28 on 7 reviews ($$$$)<br \/>\nAmrut Two Continents: 8.80 \u00b1 0.44 on 13 reviews ($$$$)<\/p>\n<p>There are few reviews of Spectrum 004 so far, but it is still getting a very high score.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s see what I found in the glass.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Colour<\/strong>: Slightly lighter than <a href=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2016\/10\/28\/amrut-spectrum\/\">Batch 1<\/a> &#8211; a bit more pinkish in hue.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nose<\/strong>:Similar nose to Batch 1, but a bit lighter overall (and less complex). Figs and raisins remain prominent, plus plums and earth cherries (gooseberries). Orange peel and a touch of lemon. Chocolate notes are even stronger now, and a touch sweeter (milk chocolate). Cinnamon and nutmeg. Coffee. Still earthy, with leather and tobacco &#8211; but a bit less sour than the first batch. A touch vinegary. A very nice nose, but I still prefer the first batch on the whole.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Palate<\/strong>:Sweet sultanas and raisins. Sour cherry and green apple (which are novel), and more lemony than the first batch &#8211; so, a bit tart overall. Chocolate and a bit of caramel &#8211; but less sweet than the first batch. Even heavier cinnamon sensation now. Anise and black pepper like before, plus some chilli pepper now &#8211; definitely a bit spicier. Leather, and that same rancio note as the first batch, which I enjoy. Rich mouthfeel. Slight woody bitterness comes in at the end.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Finish<\/strong>:Long. Potpourri, with dried fruits and spices. A bit bitter, with an astringent dryness that comes up at the end &#8211; which I didn&#8217;t recall on the first batch.<\/p>\n<p>Water brings up the sweetness in the mouth, without affecting the mouthfeel. It also seems to help a bit with the bitterness on the finish &#8211; so I strongly recommend you try it with a few drops.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Amrut.Spectrum004.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-4483 lazyload\" data-src=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Amrut.Spectrum004.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"265\" height=\"461\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Amrut.Spectrum004.jpg 265w, https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Amrut.Spectrum004-172x300.jpg 172w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 265px) 100vw, 265px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 265px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 265\/461;\" \/><\/a>It is true that the overall flavour profile is very similar to the first batch <a href=\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/2016\/10\/28\/amrut-spectrum\/\">Amrut Spectrum<\/a>.\u00a0 But it seems to me that the quality of the staves was a bit higher on that first batch, given the slight bitterness which creeps in here with the 004. I also liked the extra sweetness of the first batch. Not objectionable at all, but I definitely prefer the first batch for the all-around experience and complexity.<\/p>\n<p>Personally, I would rate the first batch of Spectrum even higher than the Meta-Critic average, and the Spectrum 004 as slightly lower. But both are excellent whiskies.<\/p>\n<p>Among reviewers, the most positive is Jonny of <a href=\"http:\/\/whiskyadvocate.com\/ratings-reviews\/?search=spectrum&amp;submit=&amp;brand_id=190&amp;rating=0&amp;price=0&amp;category=0&amp;styles_id=0&amp;issue_id=0\">Whisky Advocate<\/a>, who actually prefers 004 slightly over the first batch. Like me, Redditors <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/worldwhisky\/comments\/6y86k2\/review_59_amrut_spectrum_004\/\">Devoz<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/worldwhisky\/comments\/6qe7gm\/ww_review_50_amrut_spectrum_004\/\">Ethanized<\/a> both give 004 a lower score than the first batch. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/worldwhisky\/comments\/6miw6l\/first_ww_review_amrut_spectrum_004\/\">Saba007<\/a> is also very positive on this whisky.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Given the success of their initial hybrid cask experiment, Amrut has released a second\u00a0 batch of Spectrum. As I explained in my review of Batch 1, Spectrum is a single hybrid cask build from different sources of wood. The custom barrel for the first batch was built from new charred American Oak, new lightly toasted French Oak, new lightly toasted<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4484,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[78,137,18,17],"class_list":["post-4465","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-whiskies","tag-amrut","tag-india","tag-nas","tag-single-malt"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4465","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4465"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4465\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4493,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4465\/revisions\/4493"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4484"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4465"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4465"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4465"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}