As previously presented here<\/a>, delicate whiskies get lower overall metacritic scores compared to more complex ones. As such, the 8.33 \u00b1 0.30 (based on 16 reviews) for the Auchentoshan 12 yo is a very middle-of-the-road score for its flavour class. Note that this is significantly improved over the earlier Auchentoshan 10 year old and Classic expressions, which were more poorly received (and by all accounts, even lighter in flavour). The current Duty-Free expressions – typically identified by a certain type of wood for finishing – are similarly not well regarded by the critics (although I don’t currently track them in my database).<\/p>\n In the interest of full disclosure, I will admit to having a soft spot for this whisky \u2013 it was the first bottle that I actually purchased (although I still kick myself for letting a Scotch Malt Whisky Society bottling of a 21 yr old Glenlivet pass me by a few months earlier). Up until this Auchentoshan, the common Glenlivet\/Glenfiddich 12 yr olds or Johnny Walker Black were my entry-level introductions to the world of Scotch whiskey (as they are for many). The Auchentoshan 12 yo was suggested to me at a tasting bar as one to try next, and I was very impressed by its sweet maltiness and dry oakiness (and light touch of caramel throughout).<\/p>\n Not being a fan of cloying fruity\/floral sweetness, this was a refreshing change for me – and I bought a bottle on the spot. Like many, my tastes have expanded over the last couple of years, and I can now appreciate most anything (although I am not a fan of the young, medicinal members of cluster J). Personally, I now tend to gravitate toward the well-aged members of the cluster A-C whiskies. But I still enjoy returning to this old favourite on occasion, when looking for something uncomplicated.<\/p>\n And that’s the secret to the Auchentoshan 12 year old \u2013 it goes over well with almost everyone who tries it. If there were such thing as a “universal donor” among whiskies (i.e., something that all could accept), this is the closest I’ve found to date. For literally only a few dollars more than the ubiquitous (and innocuous) Glenlivet\/Glenfiddich 12yr olds, you get a much nicer experience here. Highly recommended if you are just starting out.<\/p>\n Probably the most positive review I’ve seen for this whisky is on the RumHowler blog<\/a>. Jim Murray also seems to be a relative fan. For a balanced perspective, you may want to check out Ralfy’s video blog<\/a>.<\/p>\n![\"Auchentoshan](\"http:\/\/whiskyanalysis.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Auchentoshan.12.jpeg\")
<\/a>Another reason for the soft spot \u2013 this is also one of my wife’s favourites. \ud83d\ude42 She is not a fan of the heavily “winey” or “smokey” single malts in my collection, and prefers this expression over most others. The Hibiki 17 year old<\/a> and the Dalwhinnie 15 year old are also high on her list \u2013 as they are with most novice whisky drinkers.<\/p>\n